← oc.culture.lt home
LT EN RU UA PL
Article 016 · Invitation to participate

Let’s create a better museum visit together

How can we improve the visitor experience at a contemporary art museum while also benefiting the museum and the people who contribute to its work? Propose an idea and help identify the most valuable ideas from others.

New to omnicracy.net? Registration guide →

Until 20 October 20263 prizes of €25 eachCluster language: English
Open the project and participate →

What are we trying to solve?

The “016-culture.lt” cluster includes the project “A Better Museum Visit, Together”. The task is to propose one concrete change that improves the visitor experience while creating value for the museum and the people involved in its work.

Your idea may concern exhibitions, information, accessibility, events, visitor feedback, volunteers’ roles or another aspect of the museum. Describe what would change, how it would work and who would benefit.

How to participate

  1. Open the “A Better Museum Visit, Together” project and read its task. The project belongs to cluster 016.
  2. Read and rate ideas already submitted. Use a translation tool if necessary.
  3. If you have a new, specific idea, submit it as one clear proposal. Check that it does not duplicate an existing idea.
  4. You will receive an email notification when new ideas appear. There is no need to log in immediately: return and rate them when convenient. You can participate by rating ideas even if you do not submit one.
Language. The cluster and project are in English, so we recommend writing ideas in English. Modern translation tools make this easier. Use short, precise sentences so your meaning survives translation; if you cannot express an idea precisely in English, first formulate it in your strongest language and check the translation.

How to rate ideas

Rate the idea itself: would it offer real value to visitors, make sense for the museum and its people, and be feasible to try? Rate ideas you disagree with as well.

+3 You like the idea and find it useful.
+4 An especially strong idea: reserve this score for ideas better than the usual ones.
+5 A truly exceptional idea. Such ideas are very rare—perhaps one in ten thousand. Do not rush to award +5: if your score differs greatly from the group’s assessment, you will receive a lower score for rating accuracy.

A negative score is appropriate when you understand a relevant idea but disagree with it or see more harm than benefit.

When should you give zero?

0 is the worst outcome for the idea’s author. Use it if the submission repeats an existing idea; combines several ideas that should be rated separately; is merely a trivial or vague statement; is off topic; or reveals its author’s identity. Do not give zero merely because you disagree with an idea or need to translate it.

What kinds of ideas fit?

Example of one clear idea: “Add one short question beside selected artworks to prompt visitors to notice a detail before reading the full description.” This suggests one specific action with a clear benefit to visitors.

Example that cannot be rated with one score: “Improve signs, lower ticket prices, open a café and extend opening hours.” These are four separate ideas that could receive different ratings.

These examples illustrate the rules; project participants rate actual ideas.

Deadline, scores and prizes

The project runs until 20 October 2026. The three participants with the highest scores will each receive €25.

A participant’s score reflects both their ideas that others rated highly and rating accuracy—how closely their ratings match what the group as a whole recognises as valuable. You can therefore win a prize without submitting any ideas if your ratings align well with the group’s collective judgement.

Anonymous participation

Ideas are assessed anonymously: their content, rather than the author’s name or position, is the focus. Do not include your name or other identifying information in the idea itself. Prize winners will need to be identified separately to receive their prizes; anonymity during idea evaluation remains in place.

Go to the project →